Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Why Does San Francisco Eat So Healthy?


I was in San Francisco this past weekend when a friend made an interesting comment.  She’s a picky eater, but throughout the weekend she found that all of her requests were honored.  After the third time she successfully got soy milk for her coffee, she commented that “it’s strange that every restaurant has soy milk.  I guess it’s because everyone eats so healthy here.”

Which begs the question – why does San Francisco eat healthier than the rest of the nation?  It’s a generalization, but this stereotype seems to hold true – there were fresh, nutritious food options everywhere.  This is pure speculation, but I have a few theories:

-          Great agricultural climate: Northern California has a mild, sunny climate that produces a vast array of fruits and vegetables.  Most of this produce comes from the Central Valley, which is one of the most productive agricultural regions in the world.  There is also an abundance of seafood, which reduces pressure to produce red meat.  This abundance of fresh, accessible produce gives locals the ability to take advantage of these healthier resources

-          Liberal culture: The west coast, and especially major cities, has traditionally been more liberal.  That liberalism may translate more into social justice and moral questions about how our food is produced and distributed.  This attitude may have led to less demand for processed, big agra food and more focus on local, sustainable products

-          Immigrant population: This is a little more theoretical, but I wonder how much the influx of Asian immigrants impacted food culture.  Traditional Chinese food (not the stuff from Panda Express) is focused around fresh vegetables, stews and steamed dishes that could take advantage of the area’s agricultural abundance

-          Higher income:  San Francisco and Marin counties have some of the highest per capita income in the US and, as research shows, higher income leads to healthier behavior

I could be completely off here, but I think many of these arguments hold some weight.  But is there a way to apply these principles to other parts of the country?

-          It would be difficult to change the nation’s agricultural landscape, but food access has improved tremendously in the past few decades.  The abundance of fresh, healthy food throughout the country and year-round has been achieved through better technology and new retailers, although with some interesting consequences

-          While the county is certainly not going to become more liberal, a greater awareness and acceptance of issues like climate change may make people question their food choices and seek out healthier, more sustainable options

-          We see ethnic foods becoming more common, which can be healthier, especially compared with meat and potatoes diets of the past

-          Increasing income is unfortunately the most difficult issue to tackle, but if we build up demand for these products using the other three factors, prices for these healthier foods may decrease and allow lower income Americans to enjoy the benefits that so many in San Francisco already do

2 comments:

  1. I appreciate these insights but I would contend that your initial observation about soy milk was off base. I would argue that soy milk is not a healthy alternative to milk it is merely an alternative to milk. The fact that more restaurants in San Fransisco offer soy milk I would think is better attributed to northern Californians willingness to listen to their bodies telling them that dairy is causing them heartburn, IBS, indigestion, eczema and a number of other ailment. Soy milk in no panacea and carries with it a number of possible negative health effect.
    As far as why CA might eat healthier food I have a story to offer. In college I had many friends from northern California. When many of them washed their hands they used just enough water to wet their hands and then turned the water off and only turned it on long enough to rinse the soap from their hands. I heard them do the same thing while showering. I ask why they did that and they said they were raised to conserve as much water as possible because drinking water was in such short supply. Perhaps when people are raised with a real sense of scarcity of water resources or anything else for that matter they are more likely to show self control and moderation with other thing in life, such a food. Perhaps all Americans could benefit from a sense of scarcity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Point taken with regards to soy milk - there's certainly a perception that it's healthier, but I think it illustrates a larger point that SF has variety in pursuit of healthier options.

    Also think your anecdote is interesting, but I think reinforces my idea about the culture of shared responsibility. While this isn't a perfect analogy, look what effect a perceived scarcity of guns is having - the exact opposite reaction among folks who value individualism over the collective good.

    ReplyDelete