I flew into Chicago last Thursday night and was greeted by this
gorgeous sight:
It’s not the traditional skyline, but in some ways I find it even more
breathtaking. Beyond its beauty, what
struck me most was the incredible planning and work that went into creating this
city. But at what price?
China is facing this exact dilemma, generating record levels of pollution
that have engulfed several cities. This
issue was highlighted by several news outlets over the past few weeks,
including this great photo essay. It’s
clear that China’s massive growth has had some short term consequences, including
apparent environmental impacts. But when
the public is breathing in pollution 25x higher than the safe amount, what are
the long term impacts to public health and the economy?
MIT released an interesting study last year examining this question. The study first laid out common health impacts
of this pollution, ranging from hospital admissions, to chronic respiratory
issues, to lost productivity. Applying
various scenarios and simulations, the study estimated that China lost $112
billion due to this pollution. While
this is dwarfed by China’s $7 trillion GDP, it’s still a staggering sum that
will only be exacerbated as the country continues to grow. Given the strain the US is currently facing
on its own healthcare system, it will be curious how China deals with its issues
down the line.
One area it needs to tackle is the disturbing misconceptions and a lack
of public information about prevention.
In the photos, you can see people wearing face masks to combat the
smog. This is also a common sight at
airports, where I usually laugh because I don’t think a flimsy mask is going to
prevent you from getting sick (there’s even some evidence to back me up). Similarly, the masks in China aren’t going to
prevent people from breathing in many of the smaller particulates that can be just
as harmful as the ones you can see. China’s
government needs to look beyond just curbing the pollution and think about educating
people on how to stay safe or risk an even larger catastrophe.
No comments:
Post a Comment